Andrew Sarangan wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote:


No, we should do useful things that might prevent a similar accident
from happening again. Anger doesn't do that.

Matt


I am puzzled why you find anger due to loss of life, which is a normal
human emotion, to be so objectionable.
We are not talking about taking rash decision like invading a country.

I find sadness more appropriate at this point. If it is determined that
the crew was drunk or such, then I think anger is appropriate. The
problem is that many people DO make rash decisions when angry and they
are seldom helpful decisions.

Matt