"FUBAR" wrote in message
...

Did you see the original post?

Yes.



The FAA order REQUIRES 2 controllers.

What FAA Order contains that requirement? Why does the FAA require two
controllers even when only one is needed?



I have been in ATCT cabs hundreds of times. I have never seen ALL the
controllers with an aircraft active with their backs to the runway.


Then you haven't been in enough tower cabs yet.



The "Administrative" duty the controller turned to do could have waited.

Was there any reason for it to wait?



With 2 controllers, the odds are way less 4 eyeballs would have been off
the active that long.


Nonsense. With two controllers you increase the odds there are four eyes
trained on a checkerboard.

How long do the controllers eyeballs need to be on the active? Should the
controllers eyeballs remain on the aircraft as long as they are on
frequency? If that's the case, you need one controller per aircraft.



I stand by my opinion. IF? the FAA HAD FOLLOWED THEIR OWN ORDERS THAT
REQUIRED 2 controllers people would be alive today.


Prove it.



Why write or publish an official order if you are going to VIOLATE it???


Agreed. It shouldn't have been published.



Unless you are incompetent, poorly trained or don't give a ****??



There's no indication of that in this case.