View Single Post
  #5  
Old August 31st 06, 04:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default The FAA sinks deeper into crap over Kentucky accident


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:FvDJg.6478$SZ3.303@dukeread04...

A tower controller's duties do not include watching the only
aircraft moving on the airport and taking off. So whether
he was looking out the window and sitting at a desk doing
the reports does not make the FAA responsible for the crash.
The flight crew is expected to use the available signage and
diagrams to find the correct runway and to verify that the
assigned runway is adequate for the aircraft. Verification
of the runway IS the PIC's job and responsibility.

If the controller cleared two aircraft to land and take-off
on runway 22 and 04 at the same time, then the controller
would be at fault in IMC, but in VFR the controller would be
contributory.

This controller seems to have done his job. The airport,
operated by the city[?], is responsible for the construction
and paint. The Airport operator is required to report
airport surface conditions so the NOTAMS can be up to date.
The airplane dispatchers is required to know and pass on
those NOTAMS and the PIC is required to get those NOTAMS.


Correct.