"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:lKIJg.6515$SZ3.5920@dukeread04...
Since you seem to think that the regulations need to be
re-written.

No, I never said that. If anything, I think it would make slightly more
sense for the FAA to keep the existing wording and adhere to it. But I don't
think it matters much either way.

--Gary


"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
. ..
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| news:L6GJg.6502$SZ3.992@dukeread04...
| Then I suggest that you write the FAA and your
congressman
| to require that the FAA clarify, in the regulations,
what
| has been the regulation, policy and interpretation of
FAR
| 61.57, so that you're pleased with the resulting text.
| Understand that nothing will change, just an expenditure
of
| a few $100,000 for public hearings, and printing.
|
| Right, so why would I bother to make that request? Why do
you suggest it?
|
| --Gary
|
|