"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news7JJg.6518$SZ3.3885@dukeread04...
They do follow their rules on 61.57.

Yes Jim, I get that you think so. But here's a constructive suggestion, in
the event that you'd like to make progress on this question. You've
mentioned you have friends who are lawyers. Why not show some of them my
message of 8/25 12:47PM (the one with the "not-P unless Q" analysis that you
refuse to address, even though it's the crux of the whole disagreement). If
they agree with me, perhaps they can explain the argument to you.
Alternatively, if they disagree with me, perhaps they could say why and you
could post their analysis here.

--Gary