Why address a premise that is wrong. Why bother lawyers, it
is your argument, you disagree with the answer you've been
given. It is up to you to resolve the issue. You contact
the FAA Regional office and ask for a legal opinion. They
have staff that will do that for you.
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
...
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| news
7JJg.6518$SZ3.3885@dukeread04...
| They do follow their rules on 61.57.
|
| Yes Jim, I get that you think so. But here's a
constructive suggestion, in
| the event that you'd like to make progress on this
question. You've
| mentioned you have friends who are lawyers. Why not show
some of them my
| message of 8/25 12:47PM (the one with the "not-P unless Q"
analysis that you
| refuse to address, even though it's the crux of the whole
disagreement). If
| they agree with me, perhaps they can explain the argument
to you.
| Alternatively, if they disagree with me, perhaps they
could say why and you
| could post their analysis here.
|
| --Gary
|
|