"Jose" wrote in message
. com...

I don't know what the point is in responding to any of your statements.

Then don't respond.



But in any case you were saying "that's not the same thing". If you are
being so pedantic that by "same" you mean "identical", then your statement
is worthless - nothing that happens at one airport is idential to what
happens at a different airport - they are different airports. But if you
take "same" to mean "similar enough", then we merely differ on how
"enough" it is. The two things were the reverse of each other but shared
the property of being out of normal synch for a moment.


They were not the same thing because one had Class D airspace and the other
did not. Apparently that is beyond your ability to understand.



It cannot.


Correct!



However, if the marginal conditions continue to exist above the D for some
distance into the overlying E, then one can get out of the airport by
flying SFFR through the D, and through however much of the E is necessary.
If SVFR is available in that E, within D's footprint, then it can be done.
If not, then it can't. Sometimes this makes a difference in being able to
get out VFR.


Okay. The same conditions exist in the cylinder of Class E airspace between
the Class D ceiling and 10,000 MSL that exist in the Class D itself. Let's
say the SVFR clearance applies to that airspace too. What are you gonna do
once you reach it? Unless the conditions outside of it are basic VFR or
better you can't leave that cylinder of airspace that overlies the Class D.