View Single Post
  #3  
Old September 4th 06, 06:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Logajan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,958
Default Why don't voice radio communications use FM?

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

You don't seem to understand there is NO quality difference in audio
quality between FM & AM, unless you're equipment is faulty and
introducing distortion. I've used AM & FM with amateur radio and been
a professional Broadcast Engineer for 30 years so believe me you are
wrong!


Odd that FM seems to sweep AM out of so many markets, then. All the
FM transmissions I've heard were superior to AM.


I believe FM's principle advantage over AM is superior immunity to certain
classes of noise - audio fidelity per se should be equal. Here's what my
copy of "The ARRL Handbook for Radio Amateurs, 2002" says about FM:

"The primary advantage of FM is its ability to produce a high signal-to-
noise ratio when receiving a signal of only moderare strength. This has
made FM popular for mobile communications services and high-quality
broadcasting. However, because of the wide bandwidth required and the
distortion suffered in skywave propagation, the use of FM has generally
been limited to frequencies higher than 29 MHz."