"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:LZ5Lg.6937$SZ3.4910@dukeread04...
Gee, why don't you write something for me and IF I agree
with what you think I should say I'll post a comment.

I'm not sure what your point is, yet again.

You are the one who replied to MY post, disagreeing with it. But you failed
to make any relevant points in your disagreement.

Why should I not respond, pointing out the lack of relevant points in your
disagreement? Should you expect to call into question any post you like,
without any rebuttals whatsoever?