Pat Russell wrote:

The SSA leadership is not trying to be nice.

No one said they WERE trying to be nice.Please dont take others posts
out of context.

They have your interests at heart.

You dont know this for sure.It would be prudent to wait until an
investigation is complete before making such a statement.

If they had "shared more information on what was going on" earlier, it
probably would have made the problem worse.

Pat, if they had shared the fact that audits were NOT being conducted 3
years ago (Right after the last incedent), this probably would not have
happened.Think about what you are saying.More information is better,
not worse.



Each week, after working on the real problem, and at a time when I'm
sure they'd like to take a small break, the Executive Committee
composes and publishes a remarkably complete and carefully worded
update for the membership. They aren't doing it to be nice; they are
doing it to keep you informed. They think you deserve it. I'm not so
sure.

What do we deserve Pat?To send 65 bucks, not to mention contest fees
and bussiness dues into some black hole where we get unaudited results
every year?


Quit your sniping.

-Pat