View Single Post
  #570  
Old September 17th 06, 02:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
SeeAndAvoid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

This is what CAMI (Civil Aeronautical Medical Institute, or something)
calls "rapidly reversing rotating schedules" or something like that. It's
usually a late shift (3p-11p) followed by an earlier late shift, then a
quick
turnaround day shift and either two more early dayshifts, or dayshift then
midshift (8 hours apart). CAMI reported this was one of the worse
schedules on the human body, saying something similar to what you said,
perpetual state of jetlag. Just when your body recovers, if at all, it's
time
to start all over again. I've been doing it for 21+ years at 3 different
facilities, 2 swings, 3 days or 2 swings, 2 days, 1 mid (graveyard). One
year, citing these CAMI studies, I tried to do the opposite, 3 day shifts -
each one later than the prior, and 2 swing shifts. I even said I'd take the
less popular days-off, like Mo/Tu or Tu/We even though I had the seniority
to get whatever I wanted. Shot down, "not the way we do it or have ever
done it".
If I were to do those 20-25min power naps, I'd say they were extremely
effective and I wouldnt get up in a daze. I'd be able to get right into the
heaviest rush - IF I were to do that. But it's not for everyone, but I
could
come out of a snoring, drooling, REM laden snoozefest - and be ready
for anything. Those that say it's not possible are wrong, based on what
I've seen. Not working graveyards go a long way towards not needing
them at all.
This whole "contract" thing...most controllers I know just want to come to
work,
do their job and be left alone. Now we're getting bothered daily with
"contract"
interpretations, GENOT's about a wrong interpretation, told that 'flat'
shoes
no matter if they're dress shoes or not are not acceptable, then the
opposite, then
we can work credit for someone else, then we can't, that we're getting a pay
cut,
then pay freeze, then status quo, then supervisors are getting a 13% pay
raise,
followed by a possible $20k pay cut, then we can't flex in, then we can...on
and
on it goes. In other words, non-stop screwing around with us with rules
that
those enforcing them don't even understand, regardless of this fairly
expensive
"class" they all went to in St. Louis..on your dime. My take, it was just
one big
party celebrating the wide swing of the pendulum in their direction.
Because
they sure didnt come back very edumacated.
Put simply, picture the least respected traffic dodgers, in other words
someone
being paid, quite a bit, to NOT do the job they were hired to do. In some
cases
it's been years, several, since talking to an airplane. These are the ones
deciding
if the shirt you have on, or the bottom of your shoe, is acceptable or not.
Same
ones who monday morning quarterback you about how you work traffic,
nevermind
they'd be downright dangerous near a scope. Now they've been given the keys
to
the kingdom with this contract, and they're going to town. It'll get real
bad before
they realize the damage they've done, and we'll all pay for it, but they
won't. If
some of you think controllers are overpaid, you need to get a load of these
types.
Paid even more to do far less. They are the problem. I like to think we
(pilots and controllers) are on the same team. I'm just not sure who they
think
lower of, controllers (worker bee's) or the users.
Rots of ruck, Chris


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote

I believe most facilities still work on a seven week rotation. Two

evening
shifts, followed by two day shifts, followed by two days off, then
repeat.
That's six days so your two days off advance by one day each week. It's
juggled a bit when the two days off are on a weekend so that there's two
natural weekends off in a row. That's the schedule for a facility that
closes at night. At 24 hour facilities you'll get a day-mid. Come in at
about six AM and then back that same day about 10 PM.


I'm surprised that there are work schedules like that, still around. It
seems like that would put a person in perpetual jet lag. That would put
people in a state where fatigue would be unpreventable, I would think.

No wonder that some think naps are needed. I would need them, I think.
--
Jim in NC