Get-Home-Itis, Arrogance, or What?
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:24:52 -0400, "Gary Drescher"
wrote in
:
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
. ..
If CFI's were authorized to instruct students in IMC, there would be
no need for CFIIs. Or am I overlooking something here?
Yes. The training doesn't count toward an instrument rating unless it's
given by a CFII. But (as far as I know) CFIs can provide IMC training for
purposes of PP emergency-IMC preparedness.
In that case, the CFI would be the sole PIC, and the CFI would have to
hold an instrument rating, but would be only demonstrating IMC
operations, not actually instructing in them?
There is always a sole PIC. A CFI is always the PIC with a pre-PP student.
CFIs always need an instrument rating. As far as I know, there is no reason
that a CFI can't let a student manipulate the controls in IMC; the time is
logged as dual, but not for purposes of an instrument rating.
--Gary
|