View Single Post
  #4  
Old September 25th 06, 08:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr,alt.aviation.safety,rec.aviation.student
John Mazor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers

"BillClinton" wrote in message
.. .
John Mazor wrote:


To blame this accident on an FAA "social engineering" program is like
saying that the reason that Johnny can't read is because he had to listen
to a classroom discussion of African-American history. He's using a
legitimate safety issue as an excuse to plaster aviation newsgroups with
racist crap.


FAA is cutting funding for Air Traffic controllers BUT they are continuing
to fund social feel good meetings at Black only gatherings at Resort Spas.

http://www.nbcfae.org/2006AnnualTraining.htm

And do you really think that identifying that anomaly in FAA funding and
staffing priorities makes a person racist?


The way you have presented it, yes.

How do you define "Whistle blowing"?
How do you define Discrimination?
What is Reverse Racism to you?


What is racism? It's what we see here in your posted crap.

Define poor funding priorities in Air Safety?


The list of examples of, and reasons for poor funding prioritie in aviation
safety is so long that the one item that you have a hard on for is
insignificant.

Did you know the FAA will not allow Anglo/Saxon only social groups?


They also do not permit all-male hiring policies. So what? Exactly what is
it that an all-Anglo-Saxon social group could accomplish that can't be done
if non-Anglo-Saxons are allowed to be present?

Is that not racist???


No. It tends to prevent racist activities. Duh.

Did you know there are laws protecting whistle blowers especially if it
involves safety of human life?


Yes. So what? The story came to light, didn't it?

What is more important for National Air Safety?

Additional Air traffic Controllers or Black only social gatherings at
resort spas??


So if FAA stopped that program, we'd have enough controllers? Or even more
controllers? Bwha-wha-wha-wha! Gawd, your naivete is exceeded only by your
racist cant. Arguing from your lack of political acumen is the Internet
equivalent of bringing a knife to a gun fight.

Don't have the balls to answer Mr.PC Brainwashed person??


I just did, Mr. Crow.

No doubt you are Black or Gay or have been mind programmed so long by PC
brainwashing that the identification of ANY minority SCAM makes that
person automatically racist.


When it's presented the way you have here, it's racism, not safety.

You poor unable to form your own thought Government School educated
brainwashed *******.


You have done well, glasshoppah, to master the technique of cutting and
pasting from "The Maroon's Guide to Racist Taunts and Other Irrelevant
Answers" - I see many such examples in your posting. I particularly like
your use of accusatory Items 6, 23, 31, and 61, and the ironic choice of
your nom de Web here. I must, however, dock you points for omitting Item 4,
where you would accuse me of being Jewish - confer with your anti-semitic
colleagues on the advantages of that rant - and the ever-popular Item 9,
where you would accuse me of being a paid shill for The eViL GuMMinT. So
you only get a B-minus here, but don't let that discourage you in your quest
for complete ignorance.

Freedom has left your soul
You are blinded by the PC God of Distortion


Not only do I curse PC, I doubly curse maroons like you that gave rise to
it.

Reminder- It is called Freedom of Speech here in America


Freedom of speech is both a two-edged sword, and our most precious freedom.

It's a two-edged sword because it means that maroons like you have access to
the marketplace of ideas, even if what you're peddling is the argumentive
equivalent of rotten fish.

It's our most precious freedom because of the heavy price we pay: letting
maroons like you annoy us.

As long as the FAA discriminates against Anglo-Saxon Heterosexual males of
European ancestry our group will not go away.


Close, but your Know Nothing argumentative skills still leave much to be
desired. The correct answer is, "As long as loser maroons like you can
manage to cover the cost of a third-hand computer and $10 a month in ISP
charges to post anonymously (and, in your case, using identifiable sock
puppets), then you and your ilk will continue to go trolling with outrageous
crap that you may or may not actually believe."