Recently, Peter Duniho posted:

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
[...]
You excerpted that context and created a truncated statement from my
reply that changed the meaning, and you are still arguing the merits
of that comment *out of context*.

Actually, just as your reply truncated the thread to the point at
which you felt a need to interject, so did mine. My reply was not
intended to address the earlier post you quote, nor did it.

It *did* however address statements such as "if the aircraft is
flying, it is not landing" (yours, and incorrect)

So, you think context is unimportant, and that the changing of context to
create a different meaning is valid. We disagree about that, so there is
nothing more to discuss, here.

Neil