But you're not aware of the resistance of the business community (of
which newspapers are a part) to FDR's New Deal?

You haven't answered this question.

You haven't addressed my FIRST point, much less anything since.

Your point in response to mine about the media (specifically newspapers) was
that the majority of newspapers since 1936 endorsed the republican
presidential candidate.

So my question is: so what?

I didn't recognize that as a question, despite the punctuation. It
seemed more like a smart alec remark.

The answer is: Matt Whiting said, IIRC, that the media are "liberal."
My question was, and still is, why would "liberal" media urge their
readers to vote for the Republican Presidential candidate?

I still haven't read an answer to that question. Can you answer it?
Will you?

Since you know little about the newspaper business, how would you know
that E&P has "zero
credibility"?

You haven't answered this question.

As well

Did you have any opinion at all, or did you even know
that Editor & Publisher existed, before you read my earlier post?

You haven't answered this question.

As well

Make your point or STFU.

Do you always resort to invective?

Only to people in gross denial and evasion.

As typical of the MSM industry, you can't follow even the simpleist line.

What is the MSM industry?

Pull your head out of your barfback mindset and come back when you get a
clue.

Discussing anything with an irrational subjectivist is pointless.

Grow up!

My goodness gracious! If you keep sayjng mean things like that, you
might hurt my feelings! (You know I take everything you say very
seriously!)

vince norris