Federal Aviation Administration to cut more air traffic controllers
"John Mazor" wrote in message
...
And I repeat my request that you show even one example of me accusing the
controller of any error. You haven't, because you can't.
I never said you accused the controller of making an error, I said you
implied that he had.
You have no connection to ALPA?
Irrelevant.
It's completely relevant.
You just blew right past my umpteenth confirmation that the
controller broke no rules - when are you going to admit that and stop
accusing me of something I never said?
I haven't done that, and I think you're intelligent enough to understand
that I haven't. Am I wrong?
Then why are you trying to protect the controller at all costs? I've
admitted numerous times that there is crew error involved.
I'm not trying to protect him at all. Why would you think he needed
protection if you knew he had made no error?
A comparison of the body of information that the two of us have
contributed to the discussion of this accident will show that I have
provided far more information to educate readers than you have.
Jon, these are aviation forums. You're not in a position to educate anyone
here. There's a lot you could learn here, but it's clear you have no
interest in that. If you'd like to educate someone try
alt.society.labor-unions.
So do tell us, what is my "true goal" here?
As I've already said, you're trying to deflect some of the responsibility
for the crash from a couple of dues-paying union members.
I never killfile anyone, but unless you have something new to contribute
beyond your hollow mantras and UseNet dodges, I see no point in responding
to any more of your "nanner, nanner, are so!" whining. Let us know if and
when you want to contribute anything substantive.
What makes you think anyone here gives a damn if you respond to their
messages?
|