"C. Massey" wrote in message
. net...

"Beavis" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Robert Barker" wrote:

Good start. Wouldn't work in Firefox, but did with IE...

Looks like a neat idea, but the HTML is completely broken. (If it'll
only work in IE and nothing else, that's a good clue that it's screwed
up.)


Start he


http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...dave.com%2Feat
ery%2FStates001.html


Write to standards, and *every* browser can parse it. Writing only for
(the very non-compliant) IE is a recipe for disaster.


Works fine in Opera, but I do agree. Make sure it is compatible with all
of
the browsers...




Good argument for pure HTML and/or pure JAVA.

Peter