Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"John Theune" wrote in message
news:j5pZg.5298$Z46.4152@trndny05...
Since it appears that there are conflicting regulations at work here, I
wonder which one wins? 91.119 or the follow the airspace rules as defined
by the charts rule? Does 91.119 apply when you have altitude above you
but not if your restricted due to airspace? I'm going to guess that it
boils down to the phrase " Undue Hazard". It does say landing without
undue hazard it does not say must land without any damage to ground or
people.


How do you see conflicting regulations at work here?


119 and it's requirement to be at a altitude that allows a landing
without undue risk to ground and the airspace restriction that says no
more then 1100 feet.