View Single Post
  #1  
Old October 19th 06, 12:44 PM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval,alt.politics.bush,us.politics
Ricardo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 72
Default the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive'build-up for war with Iran

Darn Good Intelligence wrote:
William Black wrote:

"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
groups.com...


So you think that Russia and China would intervene on the behalf of the
Iranian lunatics? I don't think they'd dare.


Would you bet your life?



Yes. The Russians and Chinese would kick up a big fuss if the U.S
attacks Iran but they wouldn't use military means to stop the U.S. That
would be WW3.

So what would the US attacking Iran be? There has to be a time when the
bullying has to be stopped. The action advocated against Iran just means
that states that previously felt a degree of security suddenly feel more
threatened - and it's not by Iran, China or Russia!

Ricardo

--
"Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand
Ignorance and prejudice, and fear, walk hand in hand ..."