"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
In a previous article, "Steven P. McNicoll"
said:
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...
Paul stated "canceling when you have sufficient visibility..." which
indicates a change in status/condition/visibility (at the point
visibility
becomes adequate).
Paul wasn't following the thread very closely. The message he responded
to
stated "when an instrument letdown to a civil airport is necessary". As
I
said, if you can operate under VFR an instrument letdown wouldn't be
necessary.

That was precisely the point I was trying to make, since somebody else
brought up the "when an instrument letdown ... is necessary" as a reason
why one *couldn't* cancel IFR once you were on an approach.

Seems obvious to me. Why is McNicoll changing the context 180 degrees?


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO