Thread
:
Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?
View Single Post
#
7
October 24th 06, 04:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
Posts: 824
Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?
In article .com,
wrote:
wrote:
Semi-Monocoque is the term, not "complimentary."
Whatever. My professor in graduate school (a Stanford Ph.D.) called it
complimentary, since the stringers and longerons compliment the skin in
that, as I said, they provide strength in a direction that the skin
does not have, which is out of plane stiffness. Since a true Mono
(meaning a single) coque (shell) structure has only a shell for
structure (an egg is a perfect example), any deviation from this is
often called semi-monocoque, even when the skin carries no load, which
is an incorrect way of describing such a structure.
You mean "complementary," meaning "completes the function," not
"complimentary," as in "offerimg compliments."
Orval Fairbairn
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Orval Fairbairn
Find all threads started by Orval Fairbairn