Thread
:
Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?
View Single Post
#
8
October 24th 06, 05:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
Posts: 111
Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?
Yes, you are correct. Thanks.
Bud
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:
wrote:
Semi-Monocoque is the term, not "complimentary."
Whatever. My professor in graduate school (a Stanford Ph.D.) called it
complimentary, since the stringers and longerons compliment the skin in
that, as I said, they provide strength in a direction that the skin
does not have, which is out of plane stiffness. Since a true Mono
(meaning a single) coque (shell) structure has only a shell for
structure (an egg is a perfect example), any deviation from this is
often called semi-monocoque, even when the skin carries no load, which
is an incorrect way of describing such a structure.
You mean "complementary," meaning "completes the function," not
"complimentary," as in "offerimg compliments."
[email protected]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by
[email protected]
Find all threads started by
[email protected]