Peter Duniho wrote:

"Jessica Taylor" wrote in message
...
You are the one who could not understand how generalizations are
offensive.

Some can be, some aren't.
This is a generalization: "Oak trees hold on to their leaves than other
trees." How is that offensive, Peter?

Are you really that simple? I really need to qualify my statement to make
it clear that I am talking about a specific type of generalization?

You certainly didn't identify any certain types of generalizations. You
merely said "generalizations are so offensive in the first place."

That word "idiotic" is coming to mind again.

If it makes you happy, you can have whatever in your mind that you please.
But you did claim that "you are the one who could not understand how
generalizations are offensive."



That's the underlying concept you don't understand, by your own
admission.

False premise and false claim.

You wrote the words. You can try to deny it now, but Google has already
archived it.

I wrote what words, Pete?