Thread
:
Rangel wants to draft 18-42 to continue with the war for Israel agenda
View Single Post
#
28
November 22nd 06, 01:41 PM posted to soc.veterans,alt.military.retired,alt.military,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Peter Skelton
external usenet poster
Posts: 93
Rangel wants to draft 18-42 to continue with the war for Israel agenda
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:25:36 -0500,
wrote:
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:02:31 -0500, Peter Skelton
wrote:
My statement is obviously correct, you could not challenge it.
I did not challenge it. I only pointed out a historical fact. Some
"slave" armies won, some lost.
In other words, you could not challenge it, I pointed out a
historical fact.
It's interesting that you stuff your turkeys with ****, it
possibly explains a lot. We have better recipies here in
Canukistan.
I met some fine Canadians at Ft. Knox earlier this year. I've
relatives in Toronto. I've visited many times over my 12 lustrums.
Most I've met were "salt of the earth" folks.
But there are exceptions to every rule.
My comment addresses the following exchange:
Regarding mandatory, uniformed service, McNicoll says, "No
freedom-loving American advocates forcing anyone into uniform."
Hunt replies:
"One can be a freedom loving American but have to understand the
price. I know of a whole two generations that paid that price. If we
aren't willing to pay that price then we don't deserve freedom."
You then chime in with a non-sequitur: "The last time you went for a
slave army, it didn't work out too well."
Are you calling it a non-sequiter because it is true, because it
disagrees with your opinion, or both?
Aside from the sheer illogiic of your comment you display the typical
lack of historical knowledge or perspective common in North American
Yuppiescum and their spawn. I'm not sure what your point was. I
doubt you know what your point was.
What illogic? Are you trying to say that the Vietnam draft had a
good effect on the US? When a Repubnazi accuses someone of
something, like lack of knowledge, it is invariably a description
of himself.
Incidentally I agree with what Mr. Hunt has to say, but he fails
to address a crucial issue, whether such a draft would result in
a capable military.
If you're bloody stupid enough to go against modern military
opinion which holds that very high standards of personal
capability and character are essential to operate a modern
military, there's little hope for you.
Peter Skelton
Peter Skelton
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Peter Skelton
Find all threads started by Peter Skelton