Thread
:
FADEC = complex
View Single Post
#
105
November 24th 06, 10:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Greg Farris
external usenet poster
Posts: 138
FADEC = complex
In article . com,
says...
....
But judging from my forty years' experience with automobile engines
(including having rebuilt my share as a youth), I would have to agree
with Mxsmanic that you're far more likely to have a sudden unannounced
failure with a FADEC system than with a traditional mechanical system,
where some warning (slack in the controls, engine output not up to par,
etc) is often forthcoming.
Well, that's a brilliant non-sequitor!
It is less surprising that you systematically defend this maniac, when we see
that you share the same deficient logic! Would you please care to tell us how
rebuilding car engines as a kid permits you to make otherwise unsubstantiated
claims about failure modes of FADEC systems in aircraft?
I worked in a pet store when I was 16, and I can assure you Mxsmaniac is
correct in his evaluation of failure modes in FADEC systems…...
Greg Farris
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Greg Farris
Find all threads started by Greg Farris