Your "somewhat wrong"analysis of his posts are from your point of view.

The point that evoked my contribution was a statement that a certain
statement that he made was "utter nonsense". It was not untter
nonsense. His POV may be utter nonsense, but the statement he made was
somewhat wrong, and somewhat right. I'm responding to the statement,
not the person.

Spelling errrors?

Ok, I made that one up.

and also attacking him ad hominum.
For good reason.

There is never a good reason for an ad hominum attack.

If it takes making more noise...

It won't work. It's what trolls want. By your analysis, it's what he
wants.

You have lost sight of the reason for jumping on the auto pilot issue.

To compare a faulty mode in a FADEC with ignoring (or whatever) an auto pilot is absurd.

Ok, then make =that= point.

You know, you are one of the most argumentative people on this group.

No I'm not.

Why are you having a problem with people arguing with him?

I'm not. What I'm having a problem with is condemning statements =just=
because they are his, and the ad hominum attacks. If anybody else had
made the statement about autopilots, it would not have garnered the
response "utter rubbish".

Jose
--
"There are 3 secrets to the perfect landing. Unfortunately, nobody knows
what they are." - (mike).
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.