View Single Post
  #18  
Old December 7th 06, 11:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default Question of aborted landing after instrument approach

Sam Spade wrote:
Newps wrote:



Sam Spade wrote:

Newps wrote:



Jim Macklin wrote:

On a missed approach begun early, prior to reaching the MAP, climb
to the missed approach altitude but do not turn until reaching the
MAP or that point indicated on the chart. If a turn is indicated,
perform that turn as charted, but not prior to the expected
position past the MAP.







From a well known instrument instructor and writer:


I don't believe this is true. Follow the instructions WHEREVER you
start the miss, and there is no need to fly to the MAP, UNLESS
specified.

Standard challenge of mine for many decades: Find me an approach
anywhere where executing the miss as stated will get you in trouble
if you miss "early" inside the FAF.

I've no objection if you DO it to feel good, but I don't believe it
is a REQUIREMENT, built into the system.


Best...
John




John obviously doesn't know TERPs criteria.







So name an approach where you get in trouble by flying the published
missed prior to the MAP where it doesn't say on the plate specifically
not to do that.


The problem is what he says, "There is to need to fly to the MAP,
unless specified."

Correctuin, I left out the critical word "no."