Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
"E Andersen" writes:

When a Twin Comanche [...] is this the "ultimate" twin? I am
considering an airplane that flies in the 165-170 knot range, prefer
a twin [...]

If you fly in bad weather a lot, issues other than maintenance or fuel
fees may come to dominate your thinking: redundancy of engines (of
course), redundancy of accessories (pumps, generators), availability
of de-icing, excess power for escaping icing or high altitude cruise.

Much less accidents in the twin because you'll so rarely get off the
ground. Twice as many mag checks fail, twice as many fuel
servos/carbs need O/H....

-Robert