View Single Post
  #5  
Old January 2nd 07, 12:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
JD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480



On Jan 1, 6:02 pm, Mike Adams wrote:
"JD" wrote:
On Jan 1, 5:44 pm, "Roy N5804F"
wrote:
"JD" wrote in
ooglegroups.com...
On Jan 1, 5:17 pm, "Roy N5804F"
wrote:
What do all the aircraft fitted with only dual 430/530's use for
primary enroute navigation under instrument rules ?


What ever they have been using. Could be VOR for example.I do
believe that the updated software for the 480 is required to cure
existing problems found with the 480 during /W certification for the
430/530 units ?


The VOR portion is an integral part of the 430/530 so I would
dispute that the 430/530's are certified for enroute in a normal
certified IFR installation.


Am I wrong again ?


Roy, could just be a time lag in reading/posting, but the 530/430s ARE
NOT currently certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE NAVIGATION, IFR or
otherwise.I think Roy is correct. The 430/530 *GPS* function is not approved for primary nav, but the built-in VOR

receiver could serve as the required additional means of navigation. The issue is not the box failing, it's
the loss of RAIM integrity with the older TSO C129a GPS boxes. This limitation goes away with the
WAAS approval.

Mike


From Garmin's news letter:

http://www.garmin.com/pressroom/aviation/110906.html

"*Due to the TSO limitation in conjunction with the AFMS limitation,
Garmin's GNS 400/500 series navigators will not be certified as a
"primary means" of GPS navigation until after customers install a new
software version. Garmin expects to issue a Service Bulletin in the
first quarter of 2007 issuing the software. The software will be
updated via the 400/500W data loader card. This required software
update is expected to be available in the first quarter of 2007."