Neil Gould writes:

Why would you care?

I was just calling your bluff, knowing that you would not be able to
answer the question.

With someone like me, it's best not to say anything like "X exists"
unless you are prepared to describe it.

There are no incorrect parts of the simulation. Prove me wrong.

It is not conjecture that you lack flight experience, as you have stated
that fact many times.

True.

It is not conjecture that you can not confirm your notion of probability,
because, among many other factors, you don't like to meet people in real
life (again, your own statement).

Sorry, but not only is this conjecture, but it is also irrelevant. I
don't see how meeting people has anything to do with the accuracy of
MSFS simulation.

Just because your attacks lack a specific target ...

What attacks?

You have not answered my question: Why do you persist in personal
attacks?

For example, you stated: "I have found that GA pilots are the least
informed and competent of all pilots."

It is an accurate generalization, as far as I know. And it is to be
expected, given the requirements for various types of piloting.

It is not insignificant that, regardless of your opinion
of GA pilots, the worst of them are more and better informed than you are
about flying real airplanes.

Here again, this is conjecture. I find it worrisome that so many
self-described GA pilots cannot answer my questions, or give
demonstrably incorrect answers, or cannot even agree on an answer
among themselves. Clearly, if they were truly all well informed,
these things would be improbable.

You feel the need to make such comments, and
in response, I point them out to readers of this NG.

You feel the need to concentrate your discussion and attacks on me. I
feel the need to discuss aviation. When you are ready to discuss
aviation also, let me know. I am not interested in discussing you.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.