Recently, Mxsmanic posted:

Neil Gould writes:

Why would you care?

I was just calling your bluff, knowing that you would not be able to
answer the question.

You know nothing other than I'm unwilling to answer your question. Every
pilot who has used MSFS, including a pilot who is a MSFS MVP has told you
that there are significant differences between its behavior and real
flying. This is just one more example, and to us, it isn't a problem worth
discussing. So, why would anyone here be motivated to provide you with
such details?

It is not conjecture that you can not confirm your notion of
probability, because, among many other factors, you don't like to
meet people in real life (again, your own statement).

Sorry, but not only is this conjecture, but it is also irrelevant.

No conjecture required. You have to meet people -- a significant number of
GA pilots in this case -- in order to assess their probable behaviors or
attitudes. You have done neither, therefore you can't possibly verify the
probability you tried to infer.

Just because your attacks lack a specific target ...

What attacks?

See this:

For example, you stated: "I have found that GA pilots are the least
informed and competent of all pilots."

It is an accurate generalization, as far as I know. And it is to be
expected, given the requirements for various types of piloting.

Your "knowledge" is based on no training and/or real experience, so as far
as you know isn't very far at all. Such comments are simply attacks on GA
pilots in a group populated by GA pilots.

It is not insignificant that, regardless of your opinion
of GA pilots, the worst of them are more and better informed than
you are about flying real airplanes.

Here again, this is conjecture.

No conjecture required. I simply stated the obvious; we fly, you do not,
ergo we are better informed about what it takes to fly than you are.

Neil