"Larry Dighera" wrote in message


Oh please. That kind of attitude isn't constructive.

No less so than evading a direct answer to a simple question, but that's
what we've come to expect from you, so it's good to see you're consistent.

At least I
proposed an idea that may serve to reduce the hazard caused by low
level Military Training Routs.

This is precisely why I asked my follow-up question. Your proposal
demostrates a lack of understanding of the purpose and use of MTRs.

What constructive information have you provided?

I'm trying to lead a horse to water. You have no trouble digging up the most
inane anti-government/anti-military minutiae, but you won't bother to
research a key piece of NAS architecture. As I said, at least you're
consistent.

Just so we're clear, what is your understanding of the definition and
purpose of "MTR's"?

Why is that significant?

This is key to understanding why your "proposal" is counter-productive. Come
back when you've done your homework.

--
John T
http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer
Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://openspf.org
____________________