Clearly, Jaun thinks its both clever and funny to post lies about
people in order to "Yank their Chain". The fact that those lies might
be harmful to them in some way never enters his mind or if it does, he
simply doesn't care. Look at some of the lies he has made up about
Chuck for a clear example. He clearly knows they are lies but repeats
them over and over again just to get a response from Chuck. That is
SICK by any definition. Jaun is the little asshole kid that used to
poke the stick through the fence to torment the neighbors dogs. One
can only hope that some day he will torment a pit-bull who will come
over the fence and tear his heart out (figuratively speaking for sure
BG).

wrote:
Steve Foley wrote:
"Mark Hickey" wrote in message
...

Juan claims that Bob had gone bankrupt.

And FWIW, wouldn't claiming (without factual basis) that someone had
filed for bankruptcy be considered libel?

I'm not a lawyer, nor did I sleep in a Holiday Inn last night, but I believe
that you must prove you've been injured/damaged/whatever by the libel in
order to collect.

Here in the US, actual harm of some sort is an element
of the torts. In the UK there are several differences among
them the concept that a defamatory statement can be
so hideous as to be inherently harmful enough to warrant
legal action.

--

FF