gpsman writes:

Your conclusion is identical to that you made
previously: those who agree with you are correct and honest; those who
disagree know you are correct, but are liars.

That was not my conclusion.

Pilots I know to be honest have agreed that MSFS is useful for
training and a reasonable simulation of flight. Pilots I know to be
insecure blowhards have insisted that it is neither. I have noted the
correlation.

If you were as smart as you seem to believe you might on your own
correctly assume a cheap game simulator approaches realism, but that's
all it does, or can do.

All simulators merely approach realism in a strict sense, but if the
part they simulate is the part you want or need, that's all that
matters.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.