Mxsmanic wrote:

Walt writes:


Good point. I read it as saying, "The B-52 is an important part of the
inventory and you're not."


Nope, that's almost the opposite of what I intended.


But it still hurt.


The least complimentary interpretation is not neccesarily the right
interpretation.


By your own admission, you don't have time to be trite. Instead,go read
up on:

Navigation
Spherical Trigonometry
Trim
Weight and Balance
Aircraft Engines
Aerodynamics
GPS
WAAS
LNAV
etc., etc.

These are all areas in which you have made egregious errors in your
posts, obviously from knowing just enough to be dangerous, and stupid.

By your own admission, the information you glean from USENET is suspect,
so you might wish to consider a moratorium on the waste of your own time.

Instead, spend more time researching your topic, and less time
exercising your digits on the USENET keyboard before you ask inane
questions.

MSFS is basically video eye candy, with little basis in reality, other
than its representation of pretty pictures. If you insist on simming
without trying reality, you might at least consider a simulator that
makes at least SOME attempt at real world physics, like X-Plane. Though
from your constant whining about your busy schedule you haven't the time
to operate it correctly.

Then get back to us. And stop cross posting. In a generous mood, I'd
classify you as a student. Post at rec.aviation.student, if at all.

Should you ever make it back to the states, please do e-mail me. I'd be
more than happy to let you try everything you think you know in my own
aircraft.

Rip