Dennis,

I used to read Kitplanes but quit when it became obvious it wasn't much
more than a mouthpiece for its advertisers. Much like Zoom's garbage.

What Drew wrote was simply the FACTS... not opinion, facts.

Two sentences of fact and one sentence with a question. You don't like
reading them... that I can understand given your own interest in the
Mini-500.

John

Dennis Fetters wrote:
Drew Dalgleish wrote:

I've never read a negative artical by Ken Armstrong in COPA or
kitplanes. I've never read a negative aircraft review in Kitplanes by
any author. Why would the mini 500 be any different?



BUT EVEN WITH A MAN WITH SUCH IMPECCABLE QUALIFICATIONS AND
UNTARNISHED REPUTATION, someone here will find something to discredit
him and his report on the Mini-500. The truth is written below, and
yet some of you will refuse to believe, simply because it is contrary
to what you want to believe.



There ya go........ I knew there would be someone insult the man!!

As Mr. Armstrong told me, he don't test fly the ones that don't look
safe. Besides, how many kitbuilts were out there at the time?...... five
or so?? I guess he could only write so many flight reviews per kit, with
the very limited numbers to write about. But again, it don't matter if
Chuck Yeager wrote a good report about the Mini-500, some of you have
your minds made up and don't want to confuse the issues with the facts.