Ron Natalie wrote:
Sam Spade wrote:

Ron Natalie wrote:

rps wrote:


Doesn't an MEA also guarantee communications reception unless an MRA
indicates a higher altitude?



No. Com reception is not a factor in MEA determination. MRA has
nothing to do with comm either. The MRA tells you that you can
receive the nav signal that is used to define an intersection (from
an off airway navaid).


Wrong. Here is the Victor Airways TERPS:

1718. MINIMUM ENROUTE INSTRUMENT ALTITUDES (MEA). An MEA will be
established for each segment of an airway/route from radio fix to
radio fix. The MEA will be established based upon obstacle clearance
over the terrain or over manmade objects, adequacy of navigation
facility performance, and communications requirements. Segments are
designated West to East and South to North. Altitudes will be
established to the nearest 100 foot increment; that is, 2049 feet
becomes 2000, and 2050 feet become 2100.


You missed the rest of the line that says "...although adequate
communication at the MEA is not guaranteed." The MRA has nothing
whatsoever to do with communciations requirements.

That is not pertinent to your statement "No, Com reception is not a
factor in MEA determination." That is just plain wrong.

Then, you go on to discuss MRA. That is a different issue.