Dave Butler wrote:
In the future I will respond to questions of this kind by just saying
"read 61.51". Actually that's still a pretty good answer. There's a lot
of misinformation in this thread that can be cleared up in a few seconds
spent reading 61.51.

Or in a couple of minutes finding the *LAST* 6,437 threads with this
discussion.

.... Alan
--
Alan Gerber
PP-ASEL
gerber AT panix DOT com