I just remembered something. I think it was with you that during a
discussion regarding the physics of a 1 G roll pointed you to a rather
nice web page where someone using classical newtonian physics showed a
family of loci that me that criterion, and you were unable to follow
the analysis and so declared it invalid.

That was simple physics, force equal mass times acceleration kinds of
stuff. Here we're talking about the reaction dynamics in inorganic
chemistry, and earlier, human physiology. Seems to me if you don't have
the tools for the simple stuff -- that roll stuff is calculus that can
be done long hand -- you don't have the tools for this either.

You are good at taking singular facts and misapplying them. Is there a
market for that skill in France? Here in the US we tend to elect such
people to public office. Or, if they work for us, we fire them.

I should badly doing this -- if MX was a cat I'd be cited for being
cruel to animals -- but I don't.


On Jan 26, 3:27 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tony writes:
The bridge mentioned earlier will take comfort in that.People have been urinating on bridges for thousands of years, and I
don't know of any that have collapsed as a result.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.