Juan,
Attempting to converse with someone who uses the tactics you do is
fruitless. I won't be posting anymore, but will end with this. In one of
your posts you said:
"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...
In article , Juan Jimenez
says...
Is that kinda like the joys of peer pressure when beloved billionaire war
heros die in things you build? 
The NTSB probable cause says it all my conscience is clear .But I do feel
bad
it happened.
Juan, Chuck never built that airplane. He supplied a kit to a buyer. And
that buyer seems to have been having problems before the fatal crash. The
following is direct from the NTSB report:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
According to the CGS dealer, prior to accepting the completed airplane in
West Virginia, the pilot
performed several flights in the accident airplane. During one flight, the
pilot left a cordless
drill on the top of the engine prior to takeoff. During the flight, the
cordless drill fell off
the engine and contacted the composite propeller. The propeller sustained
damage, and the pilot
successfully landed the airplane without further incident. The damaged
propeller was removed and
replaced. The dealer reported the pilot, on previous flights, had "no
trouble handing the
aircraft, seemed comfortable with the aircraft."
In May 2005, the pilot departed West Virginia for Jackson, Wyoming, in the
accident airplane.
According to witnesses, the airplane landed at Cram Field Airport (BUB),
Burwell, Nebraska, to
refuel. During takeoff from BUB, a piece of luggage fell from the rear of
the airplane. The pilot
returned to the airport to retrieve the luggage. A short time later, the
pilot contacted the
witnesses and reported that he had damaged the landing gear during the
landing at BUB.
According to a friend of the pilot, the pilot stated that he did not
properly latch the flaps
during the landing at BUB. While over the runway, with the flaps set in the
full position, the
flap handle disengaged, and the flaps went to the full retracted position.
Subsequently, the
airplane landed hard on the runway damaging the landing gear and fuselage
structure. The pilot
then partially disassembled the airplane, transported the airplane via truck
to Jackson, and
performed repairs to the airplane.
After the incident in Nebraska, the kit manufacturer and the dealer offered
to personally assist
the pilot in Jackson with the repairs to the airplane; however, the pilot
declined the offer for
on-scene assistance. The pilot received a various number of new replacement
components from the
kit manufacturer. Several of the pilot's friends assisted the pilot during
various phases of the
repairs. At some point during the repairs, the pilot removed the rear
floorboard, rear control
stick, rear seat and restraint system, the nose-mounted heater, the fuselage
cover, and the gap
cover. Because the windscreen was sewn into the fuselage covering, the pilot
crafted a Lexan
windscreen and riveted it onto the fuselage structure. The pilot did not
replace the fuselage
cover, gap covers or doors after the repairs were completed. The pilot's
friends also reported
that the pilot had been using an inspection mirror to search for metal
shavings in the rectangular
cutout of the boom tube during the days preceding the accident.
The accident flight was the third flight since the hard landing in Nebraska
and subsequent repairs.
During the first flight, the pilot experienced a "tail-heavy" feeling, and
he thought that the
removal of the heater had shifted the center-of-gravity (CG). The pilot
replaced the smaller
aft-mounted (near rear seat) battery with a heavier battery, which the pilot
mounted in the nose of
the airplane. The pilot reported no further problems to friends and family
regarding a CG issue.
During the second flight, the pilot experienced an overheating engine. The
pilot removed the
engine cooling air scoops from the fuselage cover (which were originally
sewn onto the fuselage
cover), and directly attached the air scoops to the fuselage structure with
rivets. The pilot
reported no further discrepancies with the airplane to his friends.
The wreckage was released to a family representative.
The accident airplane was built and completed in May 2005 by a CGS Aviation
approved dealer located
in West Virginia, in conjunction with partial assistance by the pilot. The
airplane building
records and logbooks were not obtained. According to the dealer and
acquaintances of the pilot,
the airplane had accumulated approximately 45 hours at the time of the
accident.
The accident airplane was eligible for certification in the experimental
light-sport aircraft
category. According to CFR Part 21.191(i)(1), after January 31, 2008, an
experimental certificate
would not be issued for the accident airplane. The airplane was not eligible
for certification in
the ultralight category due to a fuel capacity of greater than 10 gallons.
According to the kit
manufacturer and dealer, the pilot had intended on registering the airplane
with the FAA; however,
he had not completed the process at the time of the accident.
The cause of the acident, according to the NTSB is as follows:
The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of
this accident as follows:
The loss of airplane pitch control resulting from the pilot/owner's improper
reinstallation of the rear locking collar on the elevator control torque
tube, which allowed the torque tube to move rearward during flight and
loosen the elevator control cable tension.
Juan, that airplane is no more Chuck's than a 32 Ford hotrod is still a
Ford.
And yes, Juan, I stand by my statement:
"red12049" wrote in message
...
Juan,
For whatever it may be worth, I read that whole thread. You posted this
publicly, but did not explain the manner in which it relates to whatever
may be tormenting you. I see only a 5 plus year old version of what I am
seeing here now: Everybody insulting everybody, with you seeming to be at
the center. What am I missing here?
Tormenting me? guffaw!
This is entertainment. It occupies a tiny fraction of my time, kiddo.
chucksteak is the kind of moron who goes around usenet blindly insulting and
attacking anyone associated with Jim Campbell. That's the sort of person who
deserves no respect, and gets none from anyone outside his demented gaggle
of wackos. Take Daniels, for example. Certifiable by any standard. Most of
the other ones are in the same category. The steak came real close to
admitting he was wrong and apologizing some time ago, but pulled back at the
last minute because he just couldn't bring himself to behave like a man.
That would have ended it there, but since it didn't, and he keeps engaging
in the same behaviour, I'll be yanking his chain and watching him dance for
the foreseeable future. As entertainment.
And this is why:
"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...
In article , Juan Jimenez
says...
Let me refresh your memory, boy.
This is what started it. You were shown it again several times. You have
admitted that you did in fact start it and you have refused, like a good
little ****ant coward that you are, to apologize, and now you whine like a
stuck pig everytime I forcefeed you your own crap with a ramrod several
times a month.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...be5e18d190b5c2
Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?
Yawn...Apologize for what?? calling a toady a toady??
That is why you deserve no respect, and enjoy no credibility with anyone
outside your dozen or so groupies.
Anyone that would purposefully destroy their own reputation in ANY venue,
even one such as this, for the purpose YOU stated above, has deviated from
normal human behavior. And before you come back with a retort about me,
please remember that you know NOTHING about my background. Anything you
might post from this point forward about Chuck's airplanes, or about me for
that matter, is subject to being viewed as lies and innuendo for no
discernable purpose other than salving your own torment.
And yes Juan, we know you don't care. You only do it for
"entertainment"....So "entertain" away.
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
.. .
Oh, I'm sure it will come to you, someday.
"red12049" wrote in message
...
Juan,
I didn't try to make "anything" of it, I simply asked you a question
about your comment? Is there something incorrect about the procedure I
followed?
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
.. .
Of course I brought it up, you then tried to make some comedy of it.
Keep your day job.
"red12049" wrote in message
...
Juan,
Please read back your own posts. You brought up "Reverends", not I. I
simply asked, since you brought them up, if you had a problem with them
also.
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
.. .
For trying to transpose your own problems to others, and on the basis
of "religion" at that.
"red12049" wrote in message
...
My excuse for what, Juan?
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...
Nah, I just ignore them. What's your excuse?
"red12049" wrote in message
...
Do you have a problem with reverends, or other religious
professionals?
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...
"red12049" wrote in message
...
Ummmm.... Yes, Juan, I am the judge of that, for me. And I can
even point it out to others, so they can make their own
judgements, for themselves. As can you. That is not a delusion
Juan, that is life.
That's what "reverends" do as well. Knock yourself out.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com