So what's your point Larry? Does that make what he did ok? I call
some bozo (fellow "airman" as you say) a wanna be cop and I can expect
my fellow "airman" to post my physical contact information along with
baseless and slanderous comments that I am doing a HIGHLY ILLEGAL and
VERY DANGEROUS activity?

As far as my initial comments, he had no business suggesting that I
may or may not have been on an IFR flight plan. He's not the FAA and
he's not a moderator of this newsgroup. Was there anything in my
videos that would invite such speculation? If yes, then please point
that out - I'd sure be curious to know what it is. I should hope it's
something beyond my flying straight and level through clouds at an
even IFR altitude (as seen in the vids). If not, then I stand by my
initial comments that he's a "jerk" and wanna be cop (hardly strong
enough words to meet the definition of vituperation). I believe at
this point in time he has proven to be both of those terms in spades,
while all of his initial comments regarding me have proven to be
garbage.

I don't know what your take is on people that fly IFR illegally, but I
think it is just about one of the worst things you could possibly do
in an airplane. It is reckless, irresponsible, selfish, and beyond
dangerous. For me to be accused of such goes far beyond the use of
invective, vulgar language.

Sam

On Jan 29, 3:13 pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
On 28 Jan 2007 19:25:48 -0800, wrote in
.com:

you owe me an apology to say the leastWithout defending Mr. Kraus, it is interesting to note that it was you
who were the first to resort to vituperation by referring to Mr. Kraus
as "Cop Boy" and "Jerk" in response to his mere mention IFR operation.
Why did you find it necessary to publicly resort to unprovoked
invective language toward a fellow airman in a worldwide forum?