On Jan 30, 10:42 am, ChuckSlusarczyk
wrote:
In article .com, BobR says...
We both agreed on the blatant omission of "govern yourself
accordingly" however.
Here, guys...an oldie but goodie from October, 2005, which you haven't
seen yet...I want to see how this does on the Billy Bob rating scale!
G :
From Tue Oct 18 16:43:49 2005
X-Apparently-To:
via 206.190.37.154; Tue, 18
Oct 2005 16:43:53 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [66.36.226.248]
Return-Path:
Authentication-Results: mta219.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=superb.net;
domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 66.36.226.248 (EHLO mycp-2.superb.net) (66.36.226.248)
by mta219.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:43:53
-0700
Received: from mycp-2.superb.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
mycp-2.superb.net (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j9INho5N089191 for
; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:43:50 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from )
Received: (from www@localhost) by mycp-2.superb.net (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/
Submit) id j9INhnxO089190; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:43:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:43:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id:
To:
Subject: Superb Internet DMCA Notification Ticket (#114580) has been
created
From: Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Content-Length: 3550
Do Not reply to this email (automated)
Login to http://mycp.superb.net for full details
DMCA notification
YOU MUST RESPOND:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
NOTE: Your information will not be shared with the person/company
filing this complaint as a result of you replying to it. Failure to
act on
this report may lead to termination of your services.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
*** THE DMCA NOTIFICATION IS LOCATED BELOW THIS AUTOREPLY ***
Q: WHAT DO I DO NOW?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
SHORT ANSWER: Remove the content described and reply to this email.
Generally speaking, this can be an informal and quite friendly process
if
the content is removed quickly.
LONG ANSWER:
1) Remove the content described in the notification below.
2) Reply to this notice indicating this has been done.
3) Go about your business worry free.
*or*
1) Remove the content described in the notification below.
2) File a counter notification.
3) Place the content back online after 10 business days but
not after 14 business days.
4) Wait for a lawsuit to either be filed or not be filed
against you.
HopOne Internet Corporation and Superb Internet Corporation have a
policy that provides for the termination in appropriate circumstances
of
subscribers and account holders of the service provider's system or
network who are repeat infringers (512(i)(1)(A)).
512(f) MISREPRESENTATIONS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
This section says that anyone who makes a false claim of infringement
or false counter-notification is liable for the damages suffered by
the
other parties, including legal fees. HopOne Internet Coporation will
seek damages for a false claim of infringement or false
counter-notification.
Q: WHAT IS A COUNTER NOTIFICATION?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
A:
If an alleged infringer feels they have been forced to take the
content
offline unfairly they may file a counter notification to HopOne by
replying to this email. The counter notification must include
(512(g)(3)(A-D)):
(A) A physical or electronic signature of the alleged infringer.
(B) Identification of the material that has been removed or to
which access has been disabled and the location before removal.
(C) A statement under penalty of perjury that the alleged infringer
has a good faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as
a
result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed
or
disabled.
(D) Their name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that
they consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the
judicial district in which the address is located, or if the
subscriber's
address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in
which the service provider may be found, and that they will accept
service of process from the person who provided notification under
subsection
(c)(1)(C) or an agent of such person.
Once a valid counter notification has been received HopOne will:
* promptly provide the person who filed the original notification
with a copy of the counter notification and inform them that the
material will be replaced or access to it restored in 10 business
days
(512(g)(2)(B)).
* replace or allow to replace the material and cease disabling
access to it not less than 10 and not more than 14 business days
following
receipt of the counter notification. This does not apply, and the
material should not be replaced, if the designated agent receives
notification that legal action to seek a court order to restrain the
subscriber
from engaging in infringing activity to the material has been
commenced
(512(g)(2)(C)).
MORE INFORMATION:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation _Act
DMCA NOTIFICATION FOLLOWS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
DMCA COMPLAINT
Please be advised that those in control of
www.silversatenews.com,
(specifically, thought to be one Mark Daniels) have published, without
our
permission and in direct violation of an attached legal
warning/prohibition, intellectual property belonging to the Aero-News
Network, Inc.
The copyrighted properties were apparently published by ANN via
restricted email, between October 5th and October 18th and contain, in
part,
communications that were specifically restricted from publication or
other dissemination with the following notice:
Aero-News Network,
http://aero-news.net
POB 9132, Winter Haven, FL, 33883-9132.
863-299-8680. Fax: 863-294-3678. Mobile: 863-860-5790
Copyright (c) 1999-2005.
"Service is the rent we pay for being.
It is the very purpose of life, and not
something you do in your spare time."
Marion Wright Edelman
Legal Notice: The information contained in this Email is confidential
and intended only to be read by the person(s) to whom it is addressed.
No one is authorized to copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely on
this
information.
If this communication has been sent to you in error, please E-Mail
the
sender and destroy the message.
We discovered these infringements in the past 48 hours and have
attempted to convince the publisher that he has no right to publish
these
restricted works, and as a result, have been treated to bizarre
demands,
threats and implications of criminal action based on our serving on
an
advisory board with a person he accuses of being a racketeer, thug
and
murderer... all without providing proof or evidence of same.
The publisher has (in some cases by his own admission) misrepresented
the nature and origin of our protected communications, has engaged in
threats and attacks upon our company, and has made demands from our
company for editorial product (which we interpret as an attempt to
coerce us
to cover and report stories to suit his aims) which he has no right
to
undertake.
We believe that all materials reflecting the name, content, and
communications owned/authored/conceived by Jim Campbell and/or the
Aero-News
Network, Inc., should be removed from this site without delay and
that
his use of our software based news-ticker and any associated
intellectual property be eliminated permanently from here on out.
We take these actions because we believe ourselves to be dealing with
a
deranged personality who has engaged in a series of threats and
uncorroborated attempts to implicate our organization in criminal acts
which
have neither been proven nor documented, and for which there is no
evidence to suggest that any criminal wrong-doing has taken place.
Further;
in light of Daniel's history of threats, stalking and harassment
(involving a number of other parties, including Michael Houghton and
the Reno
Air Racing Association), we have strong concerns for our personal
safety and well-being if his actions are not checked immediately.
Therefore;
having been notified of this issue, we will hold any and all parties
associated with said threat(s) fully responsible for any manner of
harm
that may occur to our staff or businesses.
We have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials
described above on the allegedly infringing web pages is not
authorized by
the copyright owner, its agent, or the law. We swear, under penalty
of
perjury, that the information in the notification is believed
accurate
and that we are the copyright owner or are authorized to act on
behalf
of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
Govern yourself accordingly...
Sincerely;
Aero-News network, Inc., Jim Campbell, Editor-In-Chief
POB 9132, Winter Haven, FL, 33883. 863-299-8680. 10.19.05
Cc: Legal Staff, NCCS, Fl SAG
~~~~~
The fool posted his "Legal notice" AFTER his messages...and according
to Online Policy Group vs Diebold, this type of notice is worthless
anyhow. The same is true of Law. If the man or his accessories are
involved in Criminal Misconduct, a citizen is responsible to report it
and the Press must address the Public's Right to Know and the Public
Good under the First Amendment...
Imagine an Al Qaeda terrorist threatening to detonate a "dirty" bomb
in Washington D.C. His threat is true; the information is true; the
proof is undeniable; he gives away the exact location. He sends it to
a newspaper Editor, then attaches the same "Legal Notice" on the end
as Jim Campbell.
Do you, as a newspaper Editor, report him or don't you!? G
BTW, Campbell is not in Washington D.C. at the time ~ neither is
Yawnita or his BD-5J ~ so this is NOT a trick question...
....just in case you were wondering. LOL!!!
BTW, wait til you see the exchanges and the e-mails that make Campbell
a liar...coming soon! To a Federal Court near you! Or, maybe
USENET. And remember, he swore all this under penalty of Federal
Perjury! GGG All of it is denied, of course, and was at the time
and remains so today.
Has anyone yet figured out just how many times Campbell has threatened
someone and used that "Govern Yourself Accordingly" line? I think
that would be a better record for Guiness than anything involving an
unflyable, unairworthy, highly questionable BD-5J, second-hand "built"
by some Armchair Vietnam Veteran using what A. Mary Schiavo of the FAA
once defined as "suspected unapproved parts."
I mean, I hear there are people here and in RAH-14 still receiving the
threats. As for me, despite his claim in his latest rant, I've had no
contact from the moron.
The silence is deafening...as is usually the case when the silence is
coming from the guilty.