On Feb 4, 12:11 pm, "Andrew Sarangan" wrote:


Great. But the poster said Denker had made some incorrect assumptions.
I am still anxiously waiting to hear what those assumptions are.

Here is a good way to look at it. Posters on this thread referenced
Denkers material several posts ago and yet we still dont have an
answer.Is everyone on this thread stupid, or was Denker not being very
clear.Can you explain what Denker was talking about?

I don't know Denker personally, but I have read the book, which he
gives to the world for free, and I have greatly benefited from his
insights.

I think the reason his book is free is because no one would pay for
it.Think about it, it is too tecnical for some, and for others it is
not tecnical enough (or accurate enough).I think he would have a
pretty slim market if he were to publish it.Another big detraction is
the way Denker jumps back and forth between aerodynamic theory, and
giving dual instruction.This iritating and I think he should stick to
one or the other.
As far as "benifiting greatly" from this book, I gotta ask you, are
you a pilot?Not that it really maters, but it would explain why you
dont understand peoples issue with this material.

If you think my asking him to provide an explanation is
an insult, then I don't know what to say.-

I think your sugesting I am a know it all is an insult.I think your
sugestion I go back to the basics is an insult.Why dont you START with
the basics.