View Single Post
  #18  
Old February 5th 07, 02:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
ChuckSlusarczyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 216
Default Is there a problem with rah?

In article 2gGxh.1016$Yl3.973@trndny09, Jerry Springer says...

Maybe all is not known about airplanes but I sure don't care if I ever
see the words juan or zoom again. I know that most of the people I know
that read this newsgroup are tired of hearing about them over and over
and over again. The same things are hashed over and over and over
about them. It gets really tedious reading about them. I know, change my
browser to ignore them or don't read it but it is still get aggravating
to see the same subjects all the time.


In a way that's exactly what zoom wants,he wants everyone to forget what he has
done to people for the last 20 years. He backs off and waits until a new group
of newbies show up who are unaware of his past and then he can play hero all
over again.

I realize that for some, this fight gets old but it's a necessary fight. To
expose zoom is to protect newbies ,be they readers or advertizers from what zoom
will do time and time again. To readers he will portray himself as the next
coming of Chuck Yeager and a super hero who has done and flown all things
aeronautical. Newbies will take him at face value and think he's super pilot.
All wonderful and full of goodness.When in fact he's a phony.

Newbie advertizers will soon learn that if you start to advertize with him he
will run ads you didn't want and bill you for them .If you don't pay up he'll
sue you, something that Liberty Aerospace and ControlVision are now involved
in.I bet now they wish they knew about zoom's tactics before they started
advertizing with ANN .

So there is a reason for all this whether you agree or not is your decision but
I hold no grief with those who don't find it of interest. Usually it only
interests those who have been zoomed :-)

See ya

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret