View Single Post
  #8  
Old July 21st 03, 03:24 PM
Guy Alcala
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David McArthur wrote:

Mary Shafer wrote in message . ..
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 15:12:30 +0100, Alan Dicey
wrote:


snip

- a page from "The SR-71 Reconnaissance System Executive Handbook",
written by Bill Majors (Lockheed ADP), which gives the performance
envelope of the SR-71. And yes, it is subsonic to about 20,000 feet.


I hate to tell you this, but 20,000 ft isn't "low level". Low level
is a couple of hundred feet off the deck. I suppose you could stretch
it to 10,000 ft or so, but the SR is still subsonic at that altitude.

Mary


Is there a physical reason why? Or is it because of rules/regulations?
David.


I believe someone mentioned that it's a Q limit (i.e. physical strength of the airframe), 600? KCAS in this
case.

Guy