Thread: faster 182?
View Single Post
  #11  
Old February 12th 07, 08:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 678
Default faster 182?


"John T" wrote:


...it trued 147 knots! Non-turbo at 5,500 feet,
10 deg. C OAT, 135 KIAS. ... The bad news is
that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed.


The '67 182K I fly typically trues a good bit slower (~120), but I get much
better fuel burn. I'm typically burning about 12.5 gph at that altitude.

Lessee... 422nm trip @ 147 knots and 15.5 gph = 2.9 hours and $200 (no
wind and 100LL @ $4.50/gal). Same trip @ 120 kt & 12.5 gph = 3.5 hr and
$197.

Three dollars to buy 30 minutes? Tempting deal.


That's about the same mileage as Mobile to Houston, a frequent trip of mine.

In my airplane, that's 422nm/135KTAS = 3hrs 7 min. * 10.5gph * $4.50/g=
$148.00.

Hmm...$52 more to save 13 minutes. Not very exciting, but then the Skylane
is a much roomier ride than mine. Comfort counts.


My real question is: What power setting were you guys using? I'm usually in
the 65-70% range during cruise.


I believe it was 75% power, 23 X 2300, 25 deg. ROP.

--
Dan
C-172RG at BFM