"Michael Pilla" wrote in message
...

The problem is that only the folks on the side that settled know the real
reason and right now, that is Chuck since he was a principal party to the
reason for the settlement.

So is the side receiving the settlement, Michael.

He has indicated, to my satisfaction...

No, he has suggested it. He knows he can't prove it. But he knows he can
rationalize it. If you're satisfied with that, that's your prerogative. I'm
satisfied with the fact the I've proven that he's been succesfully sued,
contrary to what he's implied.

Juan