You blithering idiot, what I wrote was not a personal attack but a
scholarly observation. The first phrase of this reply may come close
to the edge of scholarly observation, but probably does not qualify as
a personal attack: Blithering "senselessly talkative", idiot "an utter
fool, (in the context of aviation newsgroups see also pest and
Mxmanic)".



y talkative rise to the level of persnoal attackOn Feb 22, 3:15 pm,
Mxsmanic wrote:
Tony writes:
You are from time to time correct. but frequently in error. In real
life, not formal debate, we consider the source of the information as
one parameter in judging its credibility.

You speak only for yourself. I'm familiar with the technique of forced
teaming, and it doesn't work with me.

Your standing has been badly eroded.

See above. In my experience, nothing does more damage to a person's position
in debate than personal attacks.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.