But then you get to "solve" that problem. Of course the
Russians ands Chinese will claim it is a weapon. The impact
statement will be 3 million pages and that will require an
impact statement to justify the wood pulp.

The point is that it is beyond human control and our effect
is miniscule.

Water is the major greenhouse gas and water absorbs CO2.
Carbon is locked in rock made by sea life such as corals and
oysters.

Making concrete releases a lot of that CO2. So does
volcanic activity.

We could all die and the world would still get hotter and
colder in a long cycle. But who would know or care?

Just as long as Al Gore gets his Oscar and Art Bell talks to
abductees.

Me, I want to date Buffy and her sister.


"Morgans" wrote in message
...
|
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
|
| It should, after all we could place large set of louvers
or
| blinds in an orbit to shade the Earth, or learn to
control
| the Sun. Besides, when has funding depended on rational
| thought, it is all about the children.
|
| IF you could actually do this, (the problems and costs are
immense, and most
| of the technology is far from existing) what is to keep
this from creating a
| problem as large as the possible threat from global
warming.
|
| Remember the dark ages? Famine, wholesale crop failures?
All because the
| solar cycle did not keep the earth within the ideal
temperature range, by a
| couple degrees.
|
| Climatic science is far from a perfected science. We
still do not know more
| than we know.
|
| For example, we could prevent the buildup of a few
degrees, and when the
| solar cycle swings the other way, everything could be too
cold. If there
| was some extra heat around, the cool-down might just bring
us back to
| normal. Lots of variables, when we don't even know what
the equation is.
| --
| Jim in NC
|
|