On Feb 25, 11:53 am, Mark Hansen wrote:
On 02/24/07 20:15, Robert M. Gary wrote:





On Feb 24, 11:37 am, Mark Hansen wrote:
I belong to a flying club. Of the many club rules, one is that the
pilot acting as PIC must be a club member. I can certainly see where
this is necessary.

However, the Chief Pilot for the club claims that the insurance
company is requiring that a safety pilot for IFR practice must also
be a club member, even when the safety pilot will *not* be acting
as PIC.

Insurance companies don't seem to care much about PIC. They determine
who is "pilot flying" (term used in most policies) mostly by what seat
you are in. However, the Chief Pilot is free to add any rules he
wants, he's kinda the boss. You certainly would never want to allow a
non-club member on the controls because the insurance co will get you
for that if there is an accident, regardless of PIC.

-Robert

Fair enough, Robert. However, what has that got to do with my specific
case? As I've said, the club member is acting as PIC. The safety pilot
is *not* flying the airplane.

Also, the Chief Pilot claims this restriction comes from the insurance
company, so (unless he's lying) this isn't a case of the Chief Pilot
making additional restrictions.

I think my point is that it doesn't make much difference if its an
insurance rule or the belief of the chief pilot. Either case is just
as binding. I know that some FBOs don't allow non-members to be safety
pilots because they are concerned that the safety pilot may end up
doing some flying. At least that is what they say, who knows. Maybe
they want the dues from the other guy. In fact, FBOs always seem
uncomfortable when a pilot, non-member is in their planes.

-Robert